The Muscle & Strength Blueprint
20 weeks, six arms, one pick each
Everything on this page is free. The stack, why each pick beat its alternatives, every option, the bloodwork and the safety lines. The week-by-week schedule and the decision rules are the members half.
Muscle is the goal where the compounds matter least and people expect them to matter most. Training and protein do the overwhelming majority of the work, which is why the foundation on this page is not a formality. What the six arms below actually change is how much of your training you keep: how fast you recover between sessions, how much of the stimulus becomes tissue, and whether the signalling environment is working with you or against you. That is a real effect, and it is a smaller one than the marketing in this space implies. Anyone telling you otherwise is selling something.
Can you run all of them? Yes - and here is what it costs
This is a general protocol. You make the final call on how much of it to run — or have it built around your labs.
Which of these 6 is actually you?
This tells you where your biggest leverage is — where to start, not where to stop. Read the But line too: it is what each lane cannot do for you, which is the part a list of options never tells you.
Before any of it — the foundation
These four are not a disclaimer at the bottom of the page. They are the reason the rest of it works, and every one of them is free.
Growth hormone is released in pulses during deep sleep, insulin sensitivity is measurably worse after one bad night, and appetite regulation collapses without it. Every compound below works through a system that sleep already governs. This is not filler advice — it is the highest-leverage item on the page and it is free.
The single dietary variable with the most consistent evidence behind it for body composition, in both directions — building and preserving. Under-eating protein while running anything anabolic is paying for a signal with no substrate to act on.
Nothing here substitutes for mechanical tension. Compounds change how well you recover from and adapt to training; they do not replace the stimulus. A protocol run without training reliably produces the side effects and not the results.
Non-exercise activity is the largest and most variable component of daily energy expenditure, and it is the one that quietly falls when you start dieting. Tracking it stops the metabolic adaptation people blame on their thyroid.
The stack
Said once, so it does not get repeated against every item. This is the research space and human data is limited on most of what follows. That is the honest state of the field, not a reason to rank these against each other — unproven is not the same as ineffective, and newer does not mean worse. Each option is described by what it DOES so you can choose on mechanism. Every compound's own page carries its evidence tier in full.
Each pick names what it was chosen over and why. That is the difference between a blueprint and a list — if you disagree with a choice, the alternative is right there and swapping it does not break the rest.
Peptides 2
Short amino-acid chains that signal rather than force. Almost all are injected or intranasal, they need reconstituting, and they are the reason most people are on this site.
A GHRH analogue and a ghrelin mimetic in one vial — they act on different receptors, which is why the pair produces a larger GH pulse than either alone. Not a double dose; genuinely complementary. The downstream IGF-1 rise is what supports recovery and nitrogen retention between sessions.
Every option here raises GH and they differ by HOW. GHRH analogues (CJC-1295, Sermorelin, Tesamorelin) prompt your own pulse and preserve its rhythm. Ghrelin mimetics (Ipamorelin, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, MK-677) work through a separate receptor and add appetite. HGH is the hormone itself — no pulse, no rhythm, and prescription-only. The combination is the base because pairing one of each is the mechanism doing the most with the least.
Stack this arm deeper5 optional add-ons
Each of these sits in this same pathway, so it starts the week this pathway starts. Swapping one in for the pick above does not change the schedule.
An oral ghrelin mimetic with a long half-life, so it raises IGF-1 around the clock rather than in pulses. On a bulk the appetite increase is a feature, which is the opposite of how it reads on the fat-loss page — same molecule, different goal, different verdict.
The trade-off Sustained rather than pulsatile signalling, which is further from physiological. Water retention and rising fasting glucose are the two that show up, and the glucose one is the reason to keep an eye on insulin.
IGF-1 itself, long-acting — the output of the axis rather than a trigger for it. Arrives at the same endpoint from the other end.
The trade-off The proliferation question applies more directly here than to a secretagogue, because you are supplying the growth signal rather than asking for one. Also suppresses your own GH output through feedback.
A stronger ghrelin mimetic than ipamorelin — more GH per dose if the pulse is what you want to maximise.
The trade-off Less selective. It raises prolactin and cortisol alongside GH, which ipamorelin was specifically designed not to do. That selectivity is the whole argument for ipamorelin being the default.
The most potent GH-releasing peptide of the group per microgram — and the one that most clearly desensitises with continuous use, which is why it is a short-block tool rather than a maintenance one.
The trade-off Raises cortisol and prolactin more than ipamorelin does, and the desensitisation is fast enough to matter within weeks.
The GHRH analogue with actual trial data on visceral fat specifically — useful in a bulk, where the fat gained preferentially is the kind that matters.
The trade-off Expensive, daily injection, and the effect on lean mass is smaller than the effect on fat distribution.
Satellite cells & local repairPEG-MGF2 options
2 options — 0 to swap in, 2 to stack ontap to collapse
Small molecules 1
Orally active compounds, most of them with a prescription history and a real clinical evidence base. Less exciting than the peptides and frequently better evidenced.
Androgen & anabolic-receptor signallingEnclomiphene4 options
4 options — 0 to swap in, 4 to stack ontap to collapse
Health supplements & substrate
The floor underneath the compounds. Cheap, well tolerated, and the part that decides whether anything above it has a fair chance — a secretagogue on a magnesium deficiency is a rounding error.
Myostatin & activin inhibitionEpicatechin3 options
3 options — 0 to swap in, 3 to stack ontap to collapse
Substrate, cell volume & training capacityCreatine4 options
4 options — 0 to swap in, 4 to stack ontap to collapse
Recovery, sleep & the anabolic window between sessionsGlycine3 options
3 options — 0 to swap in, 3 to stack ontap to collapse
The 20-week schedule
What goes in, what comes out, and when. The exact doses for each phase are inside the Academy — the structure below is free because it is the part you need to decide whether this fits your life.
| 1–4 | 5–8 | 9–16 | 17–20 | Ongoing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatine | |||||
| Glycine | |||||
| Epicatechin | |||||
| Whey Protein (RecoveryPro) | |||||
| CJC No Dac/Ipamorelin | |||||
| Enclomiphene | |||||
| PEG-MGF |
Each bar is a week block that compound is running. The shape is free — it is what tells you whether this fits your life. The doses for each phase are the members half.
Nothing exotic. Get the free leverage in and confirm the training and food are actually there.
If you cannot honestly say training and protein are consistent, stay in this phase. Every arm added later multiplies a stimulus you have to supply. Multiplying zero is still zero, and it is an expensive way to find that out.
Nothing new. Cam moved the GH pair and enclomiphene to week 1 on sign-off: *'the goal is muscle building, we ideally want to pull out all the stops.'* Both need months, so week 5 was costing runway.
Enclomiphene only if the before-panel supports it. If your total testosterone, LH and FSH are already healthy, this arm has nothing to fix and you are medicating a number that was fine.
The stimulus is established and recovery is the limiter. This is where the local arm earns its place.
Tendon adaptation lags muscle by months, not weeks. If anything has started aching, that is information — deal with it now rather than training through it.
Run the after-panel before deciding on a second block.
Creatine, protein and glycine stay — they are not a cycle. What comes off is the signalling. Keeping the muscle you built is a training and eating question from here, and the honest expectation is that some of the fullness was cell volume rather than tissue.
Time off is part of the protocol, not a failure of will.
Holding a gain is a training and protein problem, not a compound problem. The tissue does not know why it was built. Come off, keep the volume and the intake, and re-draw before deciding whether a second block is warranted.
The doses for each phase are inside
Every compound above, dosed week by week, plus the reconstitution numbers and Coach Cam's notes on running it. $10/mo.
Unlock the schedule →Bloodwork
The before-panel does two jobs. IGF-1 is your proof the GH arm is real — it is the stable downstream readout, and without a baseline you cannot tell a working product from an expensive one. The androgen numbers decide whether arm three belongs in your protocol at all. Total and free testosterone with LH, FSH and SHBG together tell you where a problem is, if there is one. Any of them alone tells you almost nothing — and if they all come back healthy, that arm is solving a problem you do not have. Use the sensitive oestradiol assay. The standard immunoassay is unreliable in men and produces numbers people then medicate.
Before you start
Everything, drawn before you start. This is the one that decides which pathway is actually yours - and the only one you cannot go back and collect later.
Around week 8
The short list, drawn while you are running it. Not a progress report - it is the draw that catches the things that go wrong quietly.
After
Drawn at the end, against your own baseline. This is what turns the protocol into information rather than a feeling.
All three are drawn at Quest, 2,000+ US locations, no doctor visit, HSA/FSA eligible. Prefer to pick and choose? Every marker above links to its own page, and the panel builder assembles any combination.
Adjusting it
A protocol you cannot adjust is a protocol you abandon. Four situations come up on nearly every run of this — nausea that will not settle, a three-week stall, hair shedding, glucose moving the wrong way. Each one has a specific answer, and the wrong answer to a stall is the reason most people end up on six compounds that each do nothing.
The four decision rules are inside
What to change, what to leave alone, and how to tell a real stall from a water shift. $10/mo.
Unlock the decision rules →The lines I'd stop at
- A new lump, or a mole that changes. Nothing here is established as causing that, and none of it is worth running while an unexplained finding is unexplained — particularly on a page whose main arms raise IGF-1.
- Numbness or tingling in the hands, especially at night. That is the carpal-tunnel presentation of GH-driven fluid retention, and it resolves on dropping the dose. Ignored, it does not.
- Any tendon pain that is sharp rather than sore, or that does not settle with 48 hours of rest. Training through that is how a manageable tendinopathy becomes a six-month problem.
- Dark or cola-coloured urine after training. That is rhabdomyolysis and it needs same-day attention.
- Numbness, tingling or swelling in the hands and wrists on a secretagogue — carpal tunnel symptoms are the classic sign that growth hormone signalling is too high.
- Blood pressure climbing, or new snoring. Both are known effects of raised GH and IGF-1 and both matter.
It is built for the common case, not for you specifically. Compound selection and dosing genuinely do change person to person — training age, bloodwork, what you have run before, what you react to. Adjust it against your own numbers using the panels above, or if you want it built around your labs rather than the average, that is what 1-on-1 coaching is for.